![]() |
|
|
| View Poll Results: Mitsubish or Subaru | |||
| Mitsubishi |
|
16 | 51.61% |
| Subaru |
|
15 | 48.39% |
| Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mitsubishi Vs Subaru.
So, who really has a better AWD system? Who makes the better car in your oppinion?! Try not to be biased in this thread either...!
Let it all out! Screw the forum rules here! :Drogar-Mark-01(DBG) This thread will be open and remain a sticky forever!
__________________
1987 Toyota Supra Turbo 1988 Toyota Supra Turbo 2003 Volkswagon Passat 1.8T 1999 Subaru Impreza L |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
mitsu for sure. Perhaps a lot of people trust subaru... but think about it, and look at the numbers. Evo comes out better in nearly everything. Better enginering = better car = EVO ROCKS!
so yea, im after mitsu.
__________________
-- Kґجỳﮔ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I haven't driven both cars agressively enough to know really how I feel about this. I love my subaru, but I'm sure I'd love an EVO also.
__________________
www.gripunit.com :) |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had a neighbor who had the sti and we would switch up occasionally for a few twisties. Both in stock form I love the torque of the sti but the road feel in evo is way better. When it comes time to do some mods the evo is way cheaper. for 3-4k you can have a bad ass evo but in the sti its just a starter. Yes i do have an evo but I have never regretted getting it over the sti. EVO!!
Last edited by evoeric; 10-07-2006 at 02:18 AM.. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top Gear is god...
Last edited by MK3Design; 10-07-2006 at 08:44 AM.. Reason: Bad Link |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
^^ great video.. i chose mitsu...
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that Subaru has an overall better car lineup, STi, WRX, Legacy, Forrester, etc...but yoiu still cant beat the EVO from mitsubishi. So its a toss up, but im going to go with Subaru.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only AWD system Ive found superior to Subaru, is Audi. However, Ive stuck with Subaru since Audi is a little more expensive.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
subaru main reason less things break when beaten on
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
mitsubishi because of raw power :)
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont think thats true... besides the EVO, the 3000GT/GSX cant beat a Legacy or WRX(not even the sti) stock can they? Correct me if Im wrong
__________________
1987 Toyota Supra Turbo 1988 Toyota Supra Turbo 2003 Volkswagon Passat 1.8T 1999 Subaru Impreza L |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mitsubishi is just okay. We've had the Mitsubishi Montero and the Galant and it was always giving us problems. I am not saying that all Mitsubishi cars have problems but through my experience with them I say Subaru.
I love the EVOs too but based on past experience I'd say go with Subaru. Subaru has been doing AWD for a long time and they have a very good Rally heritage. :) - JOhn |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmmm, I voted Soobs as I have first hand experience with my GTO. Having said that, just wait a few years where 3s's will NOT be known to have a weak drivetrain! ;)
Scotty P.s. The EVO drivetrains do kick ass. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I voted mitsu.
Stock for stock, the EVO has a "better" total package system. Case in point. Whats under the Mitsu rally car? Mitsu parts/computers like AYC Whats under a Sub rally car? Prodrive designed and built parts....and their version of AYC, lol. That being said.....I'd own an STi before an EVO. Last edited by Highboosted; 01-14-2007 at 04:41 PM.. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok I did vote Mitsu being that I own an evo and have driven other awd mitsu's b4.
But im not gunna write anything bad or good about subie because I honestly have never drove a subie b4. So I'll leave my opions to myself untill I do drive a subie
__________________
Mario- 05 Apex Silver Evo VIII |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
honestly i love them both, i chose subaru because i own one, but if it werent for the evos awd i wouldnt be as in love rally cars as i am today
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|